Our case studies are based on real life fitness to practise concerns we have received
Type of concern: Bringing profession into disrepute / inappropriate comments on social media
Profession: Paramedic
Standards
When these events happened, previous versions of the standards were in place (standards of proficiency for paramedics 2014 and standards of conduct, performance and ethics 2012). To avoid confusion the most recent versions are shown.
Standards of proficiency (1 September 2023)
- 13 You must behave with honesty and integrity and make sure that your behaviour does not damage the public’s confidence in your profession.
Standards of conduct, performance and ethics (1 September 2024)
- 2.8 You must treat your colleagues in a professional manner showing them respect and consideration.
-
2.10 You must use media-sharing networks and social networking sites responsibly.
-
2.12 You must use media-sharing networks and social networking sites responsibly, maintaining professional boundaries at all times and protecting service user/carer privacy.
- 9.1 You must make sure that your conduct justifies the public’s trust and confidence in you and your profession.
Case study
A paramedic self-referred after he posted inappropriate comments on social media, which caused his employer to suspend him.
A Conduct and Competence Committee panel considered the allegation against the registrant, who attended the hearing and was represented.
The registrant admitted all of the facts of the allegation.
The Panel found some of the facts proved amounted to misconduct.
The posts were on a public social media page and the registrant had included details of his employer.
They felt the inflammatory and offensive posts on social media could damage the public’s perception of the profession.
The Panel found that the registrant demonstrated insight, remorse and remediation.
The Panel felt that there was a low risk of the incident being repeated.
However, in considering the public interest the Panel felt that a finding of impairment was necessary to maintain confidence in the profession and the regulator.
The Panel wanted to send a clear message to the public and other health professionals that offensive and inflammatory language towards others would not be tolerated.
The Panel then went on to consider sanctions.
They decided that, because of the strong mitigating factors in this case, the imposition of a caution order was proportionate.
The Panel struck a proper balance between the need to mark the gravity of the registrant’s actions, whilst recognising the long and unblemished career, and personal, exceptional mitigation.
Measures we put in place to protect the public
The Conduct and Competence Committee Panel imposed a twelve-month caution order
- Published:
- 14/01/2019
- Resources
- Learning material
- Subcategory:
- Case study
- Audience
- Registrants, Employers
- Profession
- Paramedics