Canlyniadau chwilio am the care act 2014

These standards set out, in general terms, how we expect our registrants to behave. We will use them if someone raises a concern about a registrant’s practice, and for decisions about the character of professionals who apply to our Register.

Case study: A biomedical scientist’s employer raised concerns following an incident where the registrant failed to follow procedure. When processing samples, the registrant failed to prevent contamination, which led to inaccurate results.

Case study: Dipak is a podiatrist who has recently started co-ordinating a campaign with his employer to promote the profession to the public

The Partner team has been working with our Communications team to improve our Partner website.

Exploring the public’s view on the principles that under-pin the Indicative Sanctions Policy, specifically focusing on general public views towards it

This research focuses on registrants and service users with the remit to explore their views on the content and accessibility of the standards.

This report explores the views of key audiences on the potential use and value of mediation within the HPC's regulatory regime. 

We recently upgraded the Partner Portal to the newest version and we have created some up-to-date manuals to help you navigate the system

We have undertaken a thorough review of the existing guidance and are seeking the views of our stakeholders on the proposed revision.

The data for both these reports are from the snapshot date of 5 April in the preceding year (2020).

Annual reports on the gender and ethnicity pay gaps, with this year marking the first publication of the disability pay gap.

The HCPC has responded to Lord Darzi’s report on the Independent Investigation of the National Health Service in England.