Search results for the

This report presents the key findings from a literature review: to explore the characteristics of effective clinical and peer supervision in the workplace.

The data for both these reports is from the snapshot date of 5 April in the preceding year (2022).

In July 2006 we decided to review the standards so that we could make sure that they continued to be fit for purpose and that they conformed to the expectations of the public, registrants and other stakeholders.

This qualitative study aimed to explore expectations of the role of the HPC as a regulator, initial expectations when preparing and lodging a complaint, case handling and the outcome of the fitness to practise process.

The Health and Care Professions Council response to the Welsh Government consultation: Welsh Language Standards (Healthcare Regulators) Regulations.

Gail Nash, NHS Education for Scotland's AHP Practice Education Programme Lead, tells the story of how NHS Scotland developed models and strategies that enable AHPs to participate in meaningful supervision practice.

Case study: Munira is a physiotherapist working in private practice. She has treated her service user Russel for the last three months after he was involved in a fall at home.

This report provides information about the HPC’s work in considering allegations about the fitness to practise of our registrants.

This report contains the HCPC’s first scientific assessment of the time new HCPC registrants stayed registered for

Snapshot of outcomes related to the HCPC’s education function for the 2017-18 academic year

This data primarily relates to the application of the previous (or legacy) model, which was discontinued at the end of the 2020-21 academic year, and replaced by the new model.

This report provides highlights from the data set produced, focusing on time and quality wherever possible.

The Health and Care Professions Council response to NHS England’s consultation on the proposal for the supply and administration of medicines using patient group directions for clinical scientists across the United Kingdom. 

This report is the fourth in a series on research relating to the professions registered with the HCPC. It is part of our commitment to building the evidence base of regulation and being innovative in our approach. 

This report examines the retention rate for HCPC registrants who joined our Register via the international registration route.